Witchford mobile home set expansion refused by district council planners
PLANS to expand a mobile home park in Witchford have been rejected by East Cambs Council.
Agent Ronald Perrin appliedon behalf of owner Matthew Hall to extend the Cathedral View Mobile Home Park by up to 16 new homes, increasing the development by almost 50 per cent.
The council refused and said the development would encroach on the surrounding countryside.
Mr Perrin said the extra mobile homes, to add to the 33 already in place, would constitute low-cost affordable housing at a time when house building in the district was stagnant.
He said: “The performance for 2009/10, which admittedly was a difficult year for the economy generally, and house building in particular, shows that fewer dwellings have been coming forward and that the targets for affordable housing have not been achieved.
You may also want to watch:
“In my opinion, this supports the present application, which will provide affordable accommodation, on previously developed land, at an effective density, in a manner which will not extend on to open land.”
The park lies on the site of former RAF buildings associated with the old Lancaster Way airfield, which neighbours the site.
- 1 Dr Nik 'over the moon' after pulling off shock Labour victory
- 2 Lib Dems score notable successes in East Cambridgeshire
- 3 Dr Nik Johnson elected Mayor of Cambridgeshire and Peterborough.
- 4 Littleport tops poll for the lowest turnout in council elections
- 5 Drink driver TWICE rammed off-duty officers' car
- 6 Voters 'given a clear indication that they wish for us to try and run the council'
- 7 Death crash driver who fled is jailed
- 8 Stagecoach suspends Milton park and ride
- 9 Farm shop receives 'overwhelming' response ahead of opening
- 10 30 East Cambs candidates compete for 8 Cambridgshire County council seats
Giles Hughes, the council’s head of planning, said: “The site lies in the countryside outside the designated settlement boundary for Witchford where residential development is strictly controlled, subject to a number of exceptions, including affordable housing.
“The application provides no information about how the proposed housing is to be provided at a cost below market rates, or to remain at an affordable cost for future households.”
Mr Perrin will have six months to appeal the council’s decision.