Taxpayers count the high cost of children in care
HARD-PRESSED taxpayers in Cambridgeshire are forking out around £4 million more than average to help the county s children in care. In the last four years they have been forced to cope with a massive 114 per cent rise in costs – almost four times more tha
HARD-PRESSED taxpayers in Cambridgeshire are forking out around £4 million more than average to help the county's children in care.
In the last four years they have been forced to cope with a massive 114 per cent rise in costs - almost four times more than other areas in England.
The staggering figures have been revealed after Government inspectors looked at the way Cambridgeshire County Council manages its services for children and young people.
They discovered the cost of looking after children in care - more than £35 million last year - was 12.4 per cent higher than similar councils.
You may also want to watch:
Inspectors blamed the high costs on the use of expensive private sector foster placements, the need to place children out of the county due to the lack of local foster carers and the use of expensive agency staff to fill vacancies on front-line care teams.
County council chiefs have defended the costs claiming that when the service was inspected they had "higher levels of needy children resulting in more expensive care packages."
- 1 Shocks all round as police pull over 'white van man'
- 2 Fire destroys family bungalow in the Fens
- 3 Triple judo Olympic champion to give masterclass for Ely Dojo
- 4 G's to help save Christmas for poultry industry
- 5 HGV driver courses set up to help meet critical shortages
- 6 New Ely cinema, royal visit, Welney gets a hall and Thomas a new car
- 7 Yellow weather warning issued for Cambridgeshire
- 8 High-flying 'humble' gymnast, 9, top of the tree on county debut
- 9 80 ‘pieces of graffiti’ removed by council in just six months
- 10 Motion calls for community housing review in four villages
But costs look set to rise again next year by almost £4 million and more than £3.5 million in 2008/09.
The inspection carried out by the Commission for Social Care and Ofsted discovered vacancies on the county's social care workforce frontline teams are running at 30 per cent, resulting in the heavy use of agency staff.
"The council needs urgently to adopt a comprehensive workforce strategy if it is to improve the proportion of qualified staff working with looked-after children and children in need," the report said. "The past year has seen a serious fall in both.
"Cambridgeshire has a reasonable budgetary provision but needs to achieve better value for money in some areas."
Liberal Democrat leader, Cllr Julian Huppert, blamed "short-sighted management" on the part of the Tory-controlled council for the soaring costs.
He said: "They have got into a trap of their own making. Our children's services were rated as among the worst in the country last year. They are slightly better this year but they are still not good enough and they are too expensive.
"They have blown their budget and messed up. They are not running them well and they eat up so much money."
Overall services provided by the county council for children and young people were rated as good, however, and had improved since last year, moving from a two rating to a three.
Inspectors praised the council's partnership working with the NHS in meeting targets for reducing smoking in pregnancy, breastfeeding and MMR vaccinations.
A Cambridgeshire County Council spokesman said: "In common with local authorities across the country, Cambridgeshire has difficulty in recruiting and retaining social care staff. However, the children's needs must come first and it is better to use more expensive agency staff than not look after the children.
"In Cambridgeshire the cost of keeping looked-after children in school and the cost of transporting them can be extremely high. Cambridgeshire included all these costs, but we do not know whether other authorities did or not. Our openness may have resulted in an unrealistic comparison.
"In addition, Cambridgeshire's looked-after children have higher levels of need, resulting in more expensive care packages.