Sir Jim confronts English Heritage chief over Ely bypass objections
Sir Jim Paice and Steve Barclay with Dr Simon Thurley - Credit: Archant
MP Sir Jim Paice met with Dr Simon Thurley, chief executive of English Heritage, on Monday to discuss the future of the £30million Ely bypass.
The South East Cambridgeshire MP was joined at the meeting, held in Westminster, by his North East Cambridgeshire counterpart, Steve Barclay.
The Ely bypass plan was approved by East Cambridgeshire District Council’s planning committee back in March and was scheduled to be put before Cambridgesire County Council in April before being pushed back.
The county council was concerned over a Court of Appeal ruling involving a similar planning case in Northamptonshire and decided to push its decision back.
English Heritage has raised objections since the inception of the bypass plan, claiming that it will threaten the setting of Ely Cathedral.
You may also want to watch:
Sir Jim told Dr Thurley that widening and deepening the existing underpass would do little to solve traffic problems in the area.
Sir Jim agreed with Dr Thurley that heritage concerns should be given significant weight, along with economic and social benefits, when Cambridgeshire County Council eventually debates the bypass proposal.
Most Read
- 1 Village pub limits reopening to ‘bread and butter customers’ only
- 2 Action this day as new alliance slashes £72k from councillors' allowance budget
- 3 Park and ride from Milton to return next month
- 4 Shoppers rush to help man injured after falling in High Street
- 5 Witchford hold their heads high despite narrow Cambs League cup exit
- 6 Hifields to bring world-class artists and 6,000 festival-goers to Cambridgeshire countryside
- 7 Family pay tribute to ‘talented’ father-of-three veteran killed in crash
- 8 Letter: Amazing reunion for couple thanks to paramedics
- 9 ‘We are still struggling to cope’: Pet rescuers face ‘horrific situation’
- 10 Family traumatised as their beloved Waffle shot in the face
Councillors fear that English Heritage could ask the Government to ‘call in’ the county council’s decision if it feels heritage issues have not been adequately addressed, which would result in a public inquiry with further delay and costs.
Sir Jim said: “I strongly disagree with English Heritage about the impact on the view of the cathedral, but what really matters now is that the county council ensure they consider the heritage aspect before, I hope, deciding to give planning consent.”
