RSPCA labelled `fat police' in overweight dog trial
By Brian Farmer, PA The RSPCA was criticised tonight for successfully prosecuting two brothers who allowed their Labrador to become fat. Magistrates convicted sadler Derek Benton, 62 and his brother David, 53, of Fordham, Cambridgeshire, of causing unnec
By Brian Farmer, PA
The RSPCA was criticised tonight for successfully prosecuting two brothers who
allowed their Labrador to become fat.
Magistrates convicted sadler Derek Benton, 62 and his brother David, 53, of Fordham, Cambridgeshire, of causing
unnecessary suffering after a £12,000 two-day trial.
But they decided that the dog, Rusty - who was 11-and-a-half stone at his
- 1 21st century agreement on future of 17th century pub
- 2 ‘It’s sadly coming to a natural end’ - restaurant to close its doors by August
- 3 ‘It’s been very rewarding’ - Letizia amazed by support for La Strega
- 4 New bid for housing thwarted by Great Crested Newts
- 5 Village barn struck by arsonists in 4am blaze
- 6 Change of plan for A142 Mepal bridge works as July closures announced
- 7 Axing BBC TV news from Cambridge 'a backward step' says MP
- 8 Littleport 'hit and run' on Victoria Street
- 9 Explained: What the cost of living support package means for you
- 10 Florist 'busier than ever' hoping to build from lockdown success
heaviest - could be returned to the Bentons providing it was properly cared for.
They imposed a conditional discharge on each of the men.
David Benton, a crane driver, said afterwards that the RSPCA had behaved like ``the fat police'' and that he had been ``dumbfounded'' by the
Earlier the brothers' lawyer, Ann-Marie Gregory, had told the court in Ely,
Cambridgeshire, that the case had left the owners of overweight animals living
in fear of prosecution.
But RSPCA inspectors denied behaving unreasonably and said they had acted to
prevent Rusty suffering.
The said the dog had lost nearly four stones since being taken away from the Bentons ten months ago.
Chief Inspector Mark Thompson, who led the investigation, said he was
disappointed that the court had ruled that the dog could return home.
And he said he feared for the animal's future.
Miss Gregory said she expected the brothers to get their dog back early next
Both men denied causing unnecessary suffering, saying the animal was
overweight because it had arthritis and could not exercise.
The RSPCA told magistrates that the Bentons had allowed Rusty's weight to rise
from eight to more than eleven-and-a-half stones in two years.
Officials said the brothers, who live together in Fordham, Cambridgeshire, had
ignored veterinary advice and failed to give Rusty an appropriate diet.
They said Rusty - who is chocolate coloured and aged 11 - was ``hugely and
grossly'' overweight and a vet had described it as looking like a ``walrus''.
The RSPCA said the dog could barely walk a few steps and collapsed if kept
The Bentons denied overfeeding the dog saying they gave it a small bowl of
dried food twice a day and a bone for a treat on Saturdays.
They said the dog was overweight because it suffered from severe arthritis and
had a long-standing hip complaint.
Magistrates' chairman Bryant Watson, said the bench had concluded that the
Bentons had not followed advice and failed to feed Rusty appropriately and were
therefore guilty of causing unnecessary suffering.
He said the conditional discharge orders would stay in place for three years
and if the Bentons failed to properly care for the dog they could be brought
back to court.
Magistrates also ordered the brothers to pay court costs of £250.
Lawyers said the costs of the case were around £12,000 and the RSPCA had spent
more than £3,000 since, seizing the dog in March last year.
``We are delighted that we will be getting Rusty back - we love him to bits,''
said David Benton, outside court.
``But this has put me off ever having another dog and I think other people
will be worried about being prosecuted if their pet is overweight.
``We were dumbfounded when we were prosecuted. We couldn't believe it. And I
am very angry that we have been found guilty. We have never been cruel to an
animal in our life.
``What's going to happen next. Will you be in court if your child is too fat.
``The dog is 11-years-old and it has arthritis. What do they expect.
``You should see it when it sits in front of the fire looking at us, it looks
very happy then.
``All our neighbours and friends say the same thing - it's the RSPCA who
should be strung up, not us.
``It does feel like we've been chased by the fat police. I think a lot of
other people will be worried.
``We will make absolutely sure we look after Rusty properly and he will be
seeing a vet as soon as we get him back.''
Earlier Miss Gregory had told magistrates: ``This is a test case. It has never
been done before.''
She added: ``I have had telephone calls to my chambers - to my offices. There
are people up and down the country worried to death because their cat is a
couple of pounds overweight or their rabbit is a couple of pounds overweight.
``People are literally worrying themselves sick because their animal is not
the correct weight.
``I have to say, one wonders where this case will stop. Are we going to go
down the route of fat children. Are we going to have parents prosecuted in court
because their child is overweight. It could happen.''
But Chief Inspector Thompson refuted the Bentons' criticism and their lawyer's
``This was not about a fat dog,'' he said.
``This was about the owners of a dog who caused the animal unnecessary
suffering because they allowed it to become grossly overweight and repeatedly
failed to follow advice.
``I don't want to go along this route of suggesting that people will be
prosecuted if their dog is a little bit overweight. This isn't the case at all.
``Prosecution wasn't the first resort. The Bentons were given repeated advice
which they failed to follow.
``And I don't think this is money wasted. The dog has lost nearly four stones
since we took it into our care. It can now walk about comfortably. The money has
been spent to stop an animal suffering.''
He added: ``I am disappointed that the court is allowing the dog to return to
the Bentons. They didn't look after it properly before and how can we be sure
that they'll look after it in the future.
``All I can say is that we will monitor the dog's condition closely - with the
agreement of the Bentons - and if necessary another prosecution will be
Prosecutor Stephen Climie told the court that he did not regard the
prosecution as a test case.
``This is not a test case,'' he said. ``This is a case peculiar to its
And he said there was no comparison in the prosecution of the Bentons to any
possible prosecution of parents whose children were overweight.