Man with a medical condition is refused permission for an annexe with hydrotherapy suite at his home in Soham
- Credit: Archant
A man has been refused permission for a hydrotherapy suite in a self contained annexe near his home which he says he needs for medical reasons.
A previous planning application for a hydrotherapy suite with a bungalow was withdrawn a few weeks before the latest one.
Mr Edwards wrote to planners saying he needed the annexe near his home at The Cotesfor assisted living requirements to “enable his daughter and her family to provide round the clock care for him without having to call outside care or travel an inappropriate distance to get to him in an emergency.”
He submitted medical information outlining his condition including a letter from his GP and another from Addenbrooke’s Hospital.
Further information was submitted to explain why using his existing home was insufficient to cater for his deteriorating health demands.
You may also want to watch:
“The door openings were not wide enough for wheelchair access, there was no flush entrance threshold, kitchen furniture and worktops were insufficient strength within the existing structure to support the hoists and associated tracks which would be needed by the applicant as his health continued to deteriorate.
“The information concluded that a complete makeover of the existing property would not be financially feasible.”
- 1 Rowdy passengers force train cancellation
- 2 Daughter sets fire to father's bedroom after food outrage
- 3 Sparkling sake brewery launches in Ely
- 4 Man, 20, rapes woman as she slept, court told
- 5 Police buy clothes for Iranian children rescued from lorry
- 6 Child rapist from St Ives has been jailed after abuse
- 7 Woman delighted to finally be a mum after infertility heartache
- 8 Have your say on plans to improve city rail station
- 9 Teen rape case prompts city market safety review
- 10 St Neots murder to feature in 24 Hours in Police Custody
Councillors, however, said they could not understand why the annexe was not joined to his existing home and refused permission following a vote.
In a show of hands six councillors voted to refuse the scheme while three said it should be given the go ahead.
Soham Town councillors said it should only be approved as a “personal applciation which will expire when applicant dies or moves.”
They said Mr Edwards, had failed to demonstrate the need for a separate unit of accommodation and felt that the detached nature of it was likely to result in additional traffic along The Cotes which would have an impact on highway safety.
The plan was also outside the Soham development boundary.