Survey reveals only 13 per cent support Mepal crematorium 

£6.5m Mepal crematorium proposals

£6.5m Mepal crematorium proposals which failed to win support from residents who took part in an East Cambs Council survey. - Credit: ECDC

Only 13 per cent of those who took part in an online survey by East Cambridgeshire District Council support the £6.5m crematorium at Mepal. 

The community involvement report is part of the application to the council’s planning committee.  

It contains responses from 188 people who took part in a survey featuring 28 questions. 

These relate to need, experience at other crematoria, design, green credentials, ecology and recreation.  

The final question provided an opportunity for last views.  


You may also want to watch:


Of 123 who commented, 28.5 per cent preferred for Mepal to remain an outdoor centre. 

A further 28.5 per cent “do not think the site is the right location”. 

Most Read

And 22 per cent are “against the proposal as they do not think there is a need for another crematorium in the district”. 

Only 13 per cent said they welcomed it. 

Lib Dem opposition councillor Simon Harries described the crematorium as a “white elephant”. 

He said it was “unwanted, unneeded, environmentally unsound, a huge source of financial risk, depriving us of our best leisure asset”. 

The report also reveals that a handful of funeral directors shaped the council’s crematorium proposals. 

Fifteen months before announcing the crematorium, the council quizzed funeral directors. 

Throughout October and November 2018, the council “sought feedback” to evaluate need.  

Funeral directors from Ely, Chatteris, Cambridge, Willingham, Ramsay, Wisbech, Bury St Edmunds, Lakenheath, Ely, Newmarket, March, Soham and Downham Market were contacted.  

They were asked what crematoria they use, how many cremations they undertake annually, and the cost. 

The report says they were asked what facilities a crematorium should provide and the average cortege drive time. 

Critically the council wanted to know “would they consider using alternative facilities if they became available”.  

Only 11 responses were received but these provided “vital information.  

“Of note, was the finding that 73 per cent (eight) would consider using alternative facilities in the area if they became available,” says the report.  

It also says that a year later, when a potential bidder for Mepal retracted their offer, “this finding from the funeral director survey subsequently drove the project forwards”. 

Once the plans were formulated and “with the funeral directors showing signs of support” an outline business plan was created. 


Become a Supporter

This newspaper has been a central part of community life for many years. Our industry faces testing times, which is why we're asking for your support. Every contribution will help us continue to produce local journalism that makes a measurable difference to our community.

Become a Supporter