Developers believe converted home will not ruin village asset
- Credit: ECDC Planning Portal
Developers believe previously refused plans to turn a barn into a house near a Grade II listed building will not have a detrimental impact on its future.
Plans have been resubmitted to use a converted two-bed annexe barn on Mill Street, Isleham as a separate dwelling.
The barn is located in the same area as High House, listed as a Grade II building by Historic England in 1983, which is in poor condition.
Cameron Bosque Architects Ltd, on behalf of applicants Mr and Mrs Rose George, said the couple have carried out construction work “over the last few years.
“But financially, there are too many ongoing difficulties with the site.
“The solution is to make the barn a separate dwelling with a more manageable garden.”
Repair of brick boundary walls and reinstating railings removed during the Second World War are just some of the works required at the High House.
- 1 EastEnders star Adam Woodyatt ‘to work at restaurant in Cambridgeshire’
- 2 Inferno BBQ to be occupied by sister company Forbidden Burger Co
- 3 Middlesbrough couple found in Cambs with drugs worth around £37,000
- 4 Cambridge: Police officer had surgery after sex offender drove car at them
- 5 Table made from 5,000-year-old oak tree to be unveiled at Ely Cathedral in honour of The Queen
- 6 Can you answer these 10 GCSE questions designed for 16-year-olds?
- 7 Superintendent dons rainbow helmet against hate crime on #IDAHOBIT
- 8 'Gas engineer' reportedly stole two phones and a purse in Haddenham
- 9 See inside this £1.7m country house with its own lake near Ely
- 10 Inside the £165,000 luxury river boat for sale in the Fens
Cameron Bosque Architects Ltd hope High House “can then be taken on by another family who have the means to invest in the upkeep of the large house and grounds”.
“The proposals will create a small sustainable development, which would contribute towards economic growth.”
In 2014, revised plans to convert the outbuilding into a residential annexe were granted before an application to change it into a separate dwelling was withdrawn six years later.
Last year, permission was refused, one reason being that dividing the site would “make the building less attractive”, according to planners.
In a transport statement, Transport Planning Associates say current access “has been in historic use to serve the existing dwelling for many years without incident and the increase in activity from the proposal, will be modest”.
Walls to the north and south of the access point to Mill Street will be reduced in height as part of the plans to improve visibility for pedestrians.
A heritage statement by John Selby says the outbuilding "is currently separated from the main curtilage and will remain so.
“The outbuilding is sited in a plot which was not integral to the setting of the house and grounds.”
The statement added a separate dwelling “is not harmful to the setting and has no impact on the future viability of the heritage asset."