Government inspector will rule on future of garage in Hempfield Road, Littleport, that planners say offers ‘an oppressive outlook’
- Credit: Archant
The future of a garage – built without planning permission and described by one neighbour as making it ‘depressing to live here’ – is to be considered by a Government inspector.
The Planning Inspectorate will rule whether Anthony McFarthing can keep the garage at 16 Hempfield Road, Littleport, after East Cambs refused retrospective permission for it.
Neighbours complained they have objected each of the three times it was before planners and one claims “building of this massive garage on my boundary and 10 feet from the only natural light into my lounge is morally wrong’.
They won’t have to add additional comments since the Planning Inspectorate will make his decision by considering both the council’s view and those who made representations when it was considered locally.
Mr McFarthing first applied and was given permission for a garage but failed to build it in line with the approved plans.
You may also want to watch:
His most recent application proposed amendments to the roof ridge and eaves but the council ruled the plans “have no scale, there are also no elevations or floor plans”.
When the application was considered the council was told three neighbours lodged objections protesting about loss of light, an overbearing structure, rear windows contrary to original application, issues with roof angle and unsafe trusses.
- 1 HGV crashes into car damaged in earlier incident
- 2 Our archives reveal the 'crackpot' idea to re-open disused rail lines
- 3 Caravan wedged under Fens rail bridge
- 4 Rowdy passengers force train cancellation
- 5 See photos of the intricate final stages of the Huntingdon Viaduct removal
- 6 Daughter sets fire to father's bedroom after food outrage
- 7 7 questions that could decide if you truly are from the Fens
- 8 Police buy clothes for Iranian children rescued from lorry
- 9 Drunk driver failed to spot police car parked next to her
- 10 Sparkling sake brewery launches in Ely
Planning officers who considered the application said it dominates a neighbour’s home “to an inappropriate degree”. They also thought it created “an oppressive outlook”.
In a design statement put forward by Mr McFarthing he argues there has been “some confusion as the point of measurement” by council officials.
He also felt he had done sufficient to cover elements of design and construction put when he was visited by a council enforcement officer.