Chatteris scheme promises affordables as Fenland Council asked to drop them for Wisbech St Mary scheme

PUBLISHED: 14:34 03 January 2018

Approval expected for 58 homes at West Street, Chatteris

Approval expected for 58 homes at West Street, Chatteris


Expected approval of 58 homes at Chatteris will include 15 affordable homes – in stark contrast to an application for 80 homes at Wisbech St Mary where developers are arguing that providing affordable homes is no longer viable.

The Chatteris scheme – for land west and south of 74 West Street – is before Fenland Council planning committee next Wednesday.

A section 106 agreement will also provide £250,000 towards education and £90,000 of mixed leisure and health contributions.

However over at Wisbech St Mary, Queensbridge Homes Ltd want to build 80 instead of 50 homes on a nine acre site but is asking Fenland Council to strip away affordable housing requirements.

“It remains the case that the majority of development in Fenland is marginal in terms of overall viability”, says 3D Planning on behalf of Queensbridge Homes Ltd.

Included is a confidential “bespoke viability assessment” from Maxey Grounds and Co.

3D Planning says the report “confirms the development can only be viable if it is not encumbered with S106 obligations or the provision of affordable housing and that the developer accepts a reduced return”.

If agreed this would sweep away many of the legal provisions of the first application – agreed two years ago - that allowed for 25 per cent of the 50 homes to be classified as affordable.

Also included was £12,000 to the NHS for health care, £200,000 for education and £75,000 for leisure and open spaces.

3D is relying on a recent ruling by the Planning Inspectorate to increase the number of homes on the site following a ruling – following an appeal at Christchurch -that Fenland cannot identify a five year housing land supply. This opens the door to more homes being built with fewer restrictions.

Wisbech agent Peter Humphrey says planners need to take note of the recent ruling and he asked “when will Fenland Council accept that this is not a viable area for free homes?”

He posted on Twitter: “You need to look how much s106 contributions are. I have one site where education contributions are more than land value.... what’s all that about! If affordable Policy was 5-10 per cent may be acceptable.”

One member of Fenland planning committee said that retaining confidentiality of viability assessments and not allowing elected members to see them was wrong.

“It’s a waste of time being on this committee,” said the councillor.


Welcome , please leave your message below.

Optional - JPG files only
Optional - MP3 files only
Optional - 3GP, AVI, MOV, MPG or WMV files

Please log in to leave a comment and share your views with other Ely Standard visitors.

We enable people to post comments with the aim of encouraging open debate.

Only people who register and sign up to our terms and conditions can post comments. These terms and conditions explain our house rules and legal guidelines.

Comments are not edited by Ely Standard staff prior to publication but may be automatically filtered.

If you have a complaint about a comment please contact us by clicking on the Report This Comment button next to the comment.

Not a member yet?

Register to create your own unique Ely Standard account for free.

Signing up is free, quick and easy and offers you the chance to add comments, personalise the site with local information picked just for you, and more.

Sign up now

Most Read

Latest from the Ely Standard

Hot Jobs

Show Job Lists