Councillor could face investigation
HADDENHAM Liberal Democrat Councillor, Pauline Wilson, who dug in her heels and refused to leave a debate over a decision to cut the arts grant, could land herself in trouble. Cllr Wilson was ordered out of East Cambridgeshire District Council s overview
HADDENHAM Liberal Democrat Councillor, Pauline Wilson, who dug in her heels and refused to leave a debate over a decision to cut the arts grant, could land herself in trouble.
Cllr Wilson was ordered out of East Cambridgeshire District Council's overview and scrutiny committee as members took a vote on the move to slash £70,000 from the arts funding.
But as her colleagues on the community services committee, who had voted in favour of the cut at their meeting got up to leave she refused to budge.
Now the incident is being investigated by council officers and Cllr Wilson could be reported to the Standards Board of England which could investigate the matter.
You may also want to watch:
The board is responsible for promoting high ethical standards and investigating allegations that members' behaviour may have fallen short of the required standards.
Cllr Wilson was told she must leave the debate because she had a 'prejudicial interest' in the issue.
- 1 Illegal poachers stopped in their tracks by eagle-eyed public
- 2 Dramatic pictures catch harvester on fire in 4am blaze
- 3 'Loving, caring family man' dies in hospital weeks after A141 crash
- 4 Mosque trust named RIBA client of the year 2021
- 5 Police pursuit of suspected hare coursers ends in success
- 6 8 of the best shows coming to Cambridgeshire in November
- 7 Police investigation after village pavilion covered in graffiti
- 8 Meet the star cast of Christmas pantomime Sleeping Beauty
- 9 Fireworks join Christmas lights on the Covid cancelled list for Ely
- 10 Council expects to spend £2.4m less on older people due to 'Covid loss'
She argued, however, that there was no need for her to leave the room because she didn't have voting rights on the issue.
"I didn't feel I had a prejudicial interest," said Cllr Wilson. "It would have been a different matter if I were a voting member.
"I told the committee that I wasn't going out. It wasn't for anybody to tell me whether or not I had a prejudicial interest."
Cllr Wilson claimed she had taken advice from the Association of Liberal Democrat Councillors and believed her judgement was legally correct.
"This was an absolute sham and now I could find myself up before the Standards Board," she added.
Jeanette Thompson, East Cambridgeshire District Council's head of legal services, said: "The Members' Code of Conduct states that a councillor has a prejudicial interest in a matter before an overview and scrutiny committee if they sat on the original committee that made the decision.
"Having reviewed the code and the national guidance from the Standards Board of England, the only way to enable such councillors to speak on the item, was to allow the public the same rights.
"Under the code, however, once the councillor had exercised his right to speak and answer questions he should leave the Chamber. This advice was given to protect the members concerned from accusations of breaching the Code of Conduct.
"Officers are now considering the issue.