Council managers to be banned from using the S word (satisfactory) for fear of implying they are ‘good but not good enough’
- Credit: James Linsell-Clark / SWNS.com
Managers at East Cambridgeshire Council are to be banned from using the S word (satisfactory) to describe their employees.
The council’s head of HR Nicole Pema says feedback from senior colleagues “strongly suggested” that when assessing performance the S word was not effective.
“The word suggests that you are adequate and reasonable which are not pleasing words for people to hear about their own performance,” she says in a report to today’s meeting of the regulatory and support services committee.
She believes the S word gives the impression you are “‘good but not good enough’ and can be de-motivating. This comment was raised by a number of staff including members of the management team.
“It is proposed that the rating ‘satisfactory’ is changed to ‘good’”.
You may also want to watch:
Annual appraisals will now give staff one of five ratings: outstanding, excellent, good, needs development/training or no overall rating. Councillors are now considering changing the appraisals “to emphasise the responsibility of both the line manager, as the appraiser, and the employee, as the appraiser”.
Other changes likely to happen include telling senior managers they must inform their line managers if they have changed a provisionally agreed rating.
- 1 Rowdy passengers force train cancellation
- 2 Daughter sets fire to father's bedroom after food outrage
- 3 Sparkling sake brewery launches in Ely
- 4 Man, 20, rapes woman as she slept, court told
- 5 Police buy clothes for Iranian children rescued from lorry
- 6 Child rapist from St Ives has been jailed after abuse
- 7 Woman delighted to finally be a mum after infertility heartache
- 8 Have your say on plans to improve city rail station
- 9 Teen rape case prompts city market safety review
- 10 St Neots murder to feature in 24 Hours in Police Custody
Ms Pema also took on board comments that the appraisal forms were “too long and does not work effectively” for manual workers such as grounds maintenance staff and cleaners.
“For fairness management team have agreed manual staff still have equal access to the scheme,” she says. “However they have tasked the HR manager to produce a one-page summarised version of the appraisal form ahead of the appraisal meetings commencing next year.”
Bill Hunt, a Conservative member of the council, said: “We need things that accurately describe performance and there is a significant difference in ‘good’ and ‘satisfactory’. If I were to put ‘good’ on a scale it would be a seven and I would put ‘satisfactory’ at about five.
“If these people have problems or difficulties they should just say it.
“As far as I know this is just about some disgruntled staff but I’m no expert on this.”
•What do you think? Email me at firstname.lastname@example.org with your thoughts