Campaigners In Haddenham Are Celebrating After Controversial Plans For Traveller Site Are Refused

PUBLISHED: 11:00 12 June 2009 | UPDATED: 10:56 04 May 2010

CAMPAIGNERS in Haddenham were celebrating this week after controversial plans for a new traveller s site in the village were thrown out. Council members voted overwhelmingly to reject the plans for a second time on Wednesday (June 10) stating that there w

CAMPAIGNERS in Haddenham were celebrating this week after controversial plans for a new traveller's site in the village were thrown out.

Council members voted overwhelmingly to reject the plans for a second time on Wednesday (June 10) stating that there was 'no established need' for a site of its size in the village.

The application submitted, through Parkin Planning Services, requested the change of use of a former builder's yard on Hod Hall Lane into a traveller's site, housing three caravans and a utility block.

Speaking at the meeting Cllr Bill Hunt, said: "This isn't application for one pitch it is an application for three, and frankly I think it insults my intelligence and the intelligence of everyone on the committee to suggest otherwise."

A previous application for the site was rejected due to its excessive size back in January but applicant Parkin Planning Services subsequently submitted scaled-down plans in March to try and appease the council's worries.

Many residents suggested however, that the plans had seen little change since their last refusal. In a statement to the council, the resident's group said: "You have noted in your executive summary that few changes have been made to the previous application. It is now an application for one pitch, but is clearly a site that is designed for more."

Concerns about building on the protected development envelope and poor drainage in Hod Hall Lane were also raised by locals.

Cllr Gareth Wilson, said: "This was quite clearly a bid by the applicant to try and get round the objections raised by the council before without altering the overall aim of the plans.

A spokesperson for Parkin Planning Services said: “We are very disappointed with the decision but we are not giving up. We will be getting in touch with our client shortly and we will be considering our options.”


If you value what this story gives you, please consider supporting the Ely Standard. Click the link in the yellow box below for details.

Become a supporter

This newspaper has been a central part of community life for many years, through good times and bad, serving as your advocate and trusted source of local information. Our industry is facing testing times, which is why I’m asking for your support. Every single contribution will help us continue to produce award-winning local journalism that makes a measurable difference to our community.

Thank you.

Most Read

Most Read

Latest from the Ely Standard