East Cambs sees 80 per cent rise in number of Traveller caravans - but all on authorised sites. In Fenland 100 are NOT on authorised sites
- Credit: Archant
The number of Traveller caravans in East Cambridgeshire has increased over recent years, figures show.
Newly-released data from the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government shows that, in July, there were 158 Gypsy, Roma and Traveller caravans in East Cambridgeshire , an increase of 80 per cent since 2016.
All the caravans in East Cambridgeshire were situated on authorised sites.
In Fenland, however, more than 100 Traveller caravans are on unauthorised sites, the figures show
Unauthorised Traveller sites are areas without planning permission for their caravans, however in some cases councils tolerate them and do not attempt to move them on.
You may also want to watch:
Not tolerated sites include those where a planning enforcement notice has been served, or where an injunction has been sought against the encampment.
The total number of Traveller caravans in England has increased steadily over recent years. There were more than 22,600 in July, an increase of more than 5,000 over a decade.
- 1 Shocks all round as police pull over 'white van man'
- 2 Fire destroys family bungalow in the Fens
- 3 HGV driver courses set up to help meet critical shortages
- 4 G's to help save Christmas for poultry industry
- 5 New Ely cinema, royal visit, Welney gets a hall and Thomas a new car
- 6 Triple judo Olympic champion to give masterclass for Ely Dojo
- 7 High-flying 'humble' gymnast, 9, top of the tree on county debut
- 8 Yellow weather warning issued for Cambridgeshire
- 9 80 ‘pieces of graffiti’ removed by council in just six months
- 10 Lets get Cambridgeshire back on the buses says mayor
A minority of Traveller caravans, slightly more than 3,000, were on unauthorised sites.
Jim Davies, from the Traveller Movement, said the figures showed that the stereotypical view of Travellers painted by the media was not reflected in reality.
He said: “Certainly, the stereotypical view of Gypsies and Travellers on village greens and children’s football pitches presented by the media is largely inaccurate.
“Not only do close to 80% of Gypsies and Travellers live in bricks and mortar accommodation, but of those unauthorised caravans counted at the last caravan count, more than two thirds were on Gypsy or Traveller-owned land.”
Mr Davies added that it was important that “policy makers and researchers consider the whole Gypsy and Traveller population, instead of the minority”.
Of the 158 authorised caravan sites in East Cambridgeshire, 110 were on sites for which permanent planning permission had been granted, four had temporary planning permission and 44 were socially rented.
Local authorities in Leeds have recently trialled a system of ‘negotiated stopping’, which has been hailed as a success by Traveller groups.
It involves the council negotiating a code of conduct with the Travellers and Gypsies living on roadside camps, and providing water, waste disposal and portable toilets until the Travellers move on at an agreed date and time.
It is estimated to have saved the council thousands of pounds in legal fees.
But Cllr Simon Blackburn, of the Local Government Association, said that local authorities have a duty to uphold the law when illegal encampments are set up.
He said: “Councils are committed to ensuring that their local communities are safe, inclusive and welcoming. They also know that the vast majority of travellers are law-abiding citizens and often contribute much to the communities they stay in.
“However, when encampments are clearly breaching the law and causing concern and inconvenience to communities, local authorities have a duty to take action to ensure the law is upheld, which they do working alongside the police and the court system.
“With local authorities facing a shortfall of £7.8 billion by 2025, councils can ill afford to have to recover the significant costs of removing illegal encampments and the associated clean up costs.
“There are also instances of some encampments continuing for prolonged periods of time which can have a significant impact on local communities, with councils and private landowners often incurring costs from evicting trespassers.”