Your story about dog thefts in Cambs appeals to vague authorities and a made-up premise
Regarding your recent story warning dog owners after reports of suspicious activity across Cambridgeshire - I am compelled to write my first ever letter of complaint to any newspaper.
The story talks of ‘a warning to dog owners’, using a police logo - the implication is clear.
Police have given no such warning - in fact, there is no warning given apart from by the article itself.
There is a vague allusion to chalk markings, saying that they are “prompting fears that his house, and his dog, had been marked out by potential thieves”.
Who says this? Him? The journalist?
You may also want to watch:
The entire substance of the story is that a BMW was seen loitering at two different addresses. The allegations are completely unattributed and, aside from one person being a dog owner, there is no connection to any dog theft at all.
This is an appalling piece of journalism, with appeals to vague authorities and a made-up premise.
- 1 Punch in face leaves man with fractured nose
- 2 Defeated Tory hits out at ‘toxic brand’ and says ‘James Palmer had it coming’
- 3 Boy, 14, to wear electronic tag and obey curfew after admitting harassment
- 4 Letters: No praise for Palmer, litter picker success and neglected roads
- 5 iPads and laptops stolen in school break-in
- 6 Have your say on Network Rail increasing rail capacity through Ely
- 7 Defeated mayor on 'incredible' and 'some truly awful' people he met
- 8 Firefighters tackle deliberate barn blaze for more than four hours
- 9 Family 'thrilled' as pair's lockdown locks raise charity cash
- 10 Stagecoach suspends Milton park and ride
It seeks to build on a common urban myth - the chalk marks on a door or gate indicating a valuable dog. Check snopes.com - this has been thoroughly discredited already.
You could replace the word ‘dog’ with pretty much any other noun - car, or cat - and the article would be just as accurate.