Poets desist such a headline could I resist? a chance missed. Royal Standard licensed for music but the word must not be heard. Unlicensed verse (Excuse me Sir, do you have a licence for this poem?) What could be worse? Makes one curse. The accuse
such a headline
could I resist?
a chance missed.
licensed for music
- 1 Councillor wants apology for Nadine Dorries 'misogynist' tweet
- 2 Prison for 'lavish lifestyle' drug dealer who hid £18k cash in sock drawer
- 3 Best Indian in CAMBRIDGESHIRE even though award says best in NORFOLK
- 4 New shop already 'exceeded expectations' after strong opening day
- 5 Driver escapes injury after car hits wall
- 6 Ely Rotary Club back with annual Christmas collection
- 7 Two year ban on begging for these six
- 8 Nuisance caller flouted court order day after prison release
- 9 GP practices mark ‘momentous milestone’ in Covid-19 vaccine programme
- 10 How do Cambridgeshire Fens' Covid cases compare to November 2020 lockdown?
but the word
must not be heard.
(Excuse me Sir, do you have a licence for this poem?)
What could be worse?
Makes one curse.
The accused was heard to say,
in a declamatory sort of way,
some poems and verse, without
a licence for word or play.
A backing by guitar or drum,
banged or strummed,
might be a musical performance
and keep officials shtumm.
Compared to music is verse more inflammable?
Or will it cause riots or a crowd uncontrollable?
Surely even an apparatchik can see
that verse and rhyme must be allowable.
Petty? Of course not, who would think such a thing? After all rules is rules.