Poets desist such a headline could I resist? a chance missed. Royal Standard licensed for music but the word must not be heard. Unlicensed verse (Excuse me Sir, do you have a licence for this poem?) What could be worse? Makes one curse. The accuse
such a headline
could I resist?
a chance missed.
You may also want to watch:
licensed for music
- 1 Police swoop on Chatteris housing estate following machete threat
- 2 Shoppers rush to help man injured after falling in High Street
- 3 Lockdown easing - 10 pubs and restaurants say welcome back
- 4 Residents 'horrified' by Swastika graffiti in grounds of Ely Cathedral
- 5 Woman dies after being hit by lorry
- 6 Charity shop supervisor fraudster must pay back £2,550
- 7 Opposition sign historic power sharing agreement to seize control of county council
- 8 Littleport marks Royal British Legion centenary year with moving ceremony
- 9 Woman transforms lockdown 'art retreat' into her own business
- 10 Man remains in custody after 'firearm and threat to kill' arrest
but the word
must not be heard.
(Excuse me Sir, do you have a licence for this poem?)
What could be worse?
Makes one curse.
The accused was heard to say,
in a declamatory sort of way,
some poems and verse, without
a licence for word or play.
A backing by guitar or drum,
banged or strummed,
might be a musical performance
and keep officials shtumm.
Compared to music is verse more inflammable?
Or will it cause riots or a crowd uncontrollable?
Surely even an apparatchik can see
that verse and rhyme must be allowable.
Petty? Of course not, who would think such a thing? After all rules is rules.