LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Lowering the road is not the answer - a bypass for Ely most assuredly is
- Credit: Archant
Surely the prime purpose of the bypass is to take heavy goods vehicles away from Ely.
The idea of lowering the road is not the answer for the following reasons.
It will still mean vehicles up to 44 tonnes still using Angel Drove and Station Road.
The current height clearance is 2.7m/9 feet. The maximum height of vehicles allowed on UK roads is 5.03m/16’6”.
Now I’m no engineer, but the road would have to be lowered about 3m to allow these vehicles to pass under the railway.
If you are not going to lower it enough to let these vehicles through, you might as well leave it as it is.
To lower the road by this amount cannot be feasible for the following reasons.
- 1 21st century agreement on future of 17th century pub
- 2 ‘It’s sadly coming to a natural end’ - restaurant to close its doors by August
- 3 ‘It’s been very rewarding’ - Letizia amazed by support for La Strega
- 4 Village barn struck by arsonists in 4am blaze
- 5 New bid for housing thwarted by Great Crested Newts
- 6 Littleport 'hit and run' on Victoria Street
- 7 Change of plan for A142 Mepal bridge works as July closures announced
- 8 Florist 'busier than ever' hoping to build from lockdown success
- 9 Axing BBC TV news from Cambridge 'a backward step' says MP
- 10 Explained: What the cost of living support package means for you
Any work taking place would mean closure of the bridge.
Work under the bridge would probably mean disruption to rail services.
If the road is lowered the current access would be too steep, and there is no way to change this (access to the station?).
The underpass would probably not be wide enough anyway to allow two hgvs to pass.
Then there’s the problem with flooding, meaning a system of pumps would have to be provided.
And anyway an elevated approach to Ely would surely improve the view of the Cathedral, even they approve of the bypass.