Could Money Spent On Fighting Roswell Pits Have Been Used To Fund Market Stalls?
IN your article on Jeremy Tyrrell, it was stated that counsel highlighted to the court that no environmental damage had been caused by the construction works. During the hearing, at which I was present, the court heard that work, including building sectio
IN your article on Jeremy Tyrrell, it was stated that counsel highlighted to the court that no environmental damage had been caused by the construction works. During the hearing, at which I was present, the court heard that work, including building sections of concrete for vehicles, laying of hard core and digging over 100 m. of trenching had been carried out. Trees were removed and whole areas of top soil and the associated flora & fauna scraped away. How could this be achieved with 'no environmental damage' is difficult to see.
The article only mentions one SSSI, dated 2009, applying to the area. In 1982 a SSSI was granted covering the geological features of Roswell Pits, it was extended in 2009.
I would also like to ask what Mr Tyrrell actions have cost the Council Tax payer? Had he not carried out his unauthorised and now illegal work there may have been enough saved for the market stalls.
You may also want to watch:
- 1 Jail for bank card fraudster caught on CCTV
- 2 Prosecution threat against businesses found not to be Covid-19 secure
- 3 'Dedicated' PCSO retires after 12 years amid force funding cuts
- 4 Man who died in road crash is named
- 5 ‘Beloved’ primary school headteacher leaving after 16 years in Soham
- 6 Woman to travel 100km in her wheelchair to fundraise for autism charity
- 7 You can now watch Ely Cathedral’s rare Peregrine Falcons live 24/7
- 8 Jail and criminal behaviour order for woman who spat at police officer
- 9 Community pharmacy teams to offer free Covid-19 test kits
- 10 Volunteer group's Covid-closure after raising £70,000 in 30 years