Can McCarthy & Stone’s trading methods be trusted?
CAN McCarthy & Stone be trusted?
Your readers may already be aware of its alleged sharp trading practices with people who thought they were buying into a stress free “later living” lifestyle.
Complaints about their part-exchange scheme were the subject of a Channel 4 Dispatches programme in September last year.
Anyone thinking of buying at the Croylands site, should it go ahead, would be well advised to do their research thoroughly before entering into a contract.
Cambridgeshire County Council probably also believed what McCarthy & Stone said in its letter offering to buy Croylands, written by senior land manager Chris Patterson.
You may also want to watch:
The letter, written in November 2011 and obtained under a Freedom of Information Act request, relates to the offer to purchase Croylands and contains specific terms under which their offer is made.
The letter states: “Our proposal has been carefully designed to incorporate the preserved trees on site and as such none should be lost due to the redevelopment of the property.”
Most Read
- 1 High life ends for Bentley owning drug dealer
- 2 New Google Search data reveals Ely is one of Britain’s most tired cities
- 3 Ely Cathedral's Covid-19 vaccination centre application was turned down
- 4 County cops issue more than 60 Covid fines since beginning of 2021
- 5 Nobody home as police force entry after reports of drugs activity
- 6 Man who spent Christmas alone in intensive care proposes to girlfriend
- 7 Number of fatal injuries caused on our roads ‘remains far too high’
- 8 Keep a birds-eye view on resident Peregrine falcons by watching webcam
- 9 Fight with weapons outside gym leaves two people seriously injured
- 10 Dad of two killed on Fen road
Croylands is subject to three Tree Protection Orders, giving blanket protection to trees on the site, some of which are also specifically listed in the orders.
In stark contrast to the offer made to the county council, in the planning application recently submitted to East Cambridgeshire District Council by McCarthy & Stone, it proposes to destroy 26 trees on the site, including some which are specifically listed in the orders.
Not quite what was suggested in the offer to the county council then.
Has McCarthy & Stone broken the law or any contractual terms? Probably not, either in the case of its residents elsewhere in the UK, or in the case of its dealings with the county council.
But its methods appear to be morally questionable and certainly, in my opinion, they are not to be trusted.
ANNA BAILEY
Cambridge Road
Ely
Via e-mail
