Residents’ raw deal

PUBLISHED: 12:51 24 January 2008 | UPDATED: 10:01 04 May 2010

THE Conservative car parking strategy has the stated aim of assisting business in the city, yet residents pay Council Tax to the local authority, while business rates go direct to central Government. The council is thus choosing to subsidise business, ha

THE Conservative car parking strategy has the stated aim of assisting business in the city, yet residents pay Council Tax to the local authority, while business rates go direct to central Government.

The council is thus choosing to subsidise business, having the costs of the car parks borne by domestic council taxpayers, many of whom are not car owners.

I believe that these subsidies are in excess of £400,000 a year.

Many businesses provide their own car parking, and find it advantageous to do so.

Tesco is an obvious example, but there are others. Some are long established in the city and have chosen sites that allow for staff and some customer parking.

Some businesses provide minimal on-site parking but piggy-back on public provision, and are even being allowed permits as well.

Yet residents, who have chosen to locate in the city, are not to be offered the same advantages as businesses even though, as Council Tax payers, they are at least making some contribution towards the upkeep of the car parks.

IAN ALLEN, District Councillor (Haddenham ward)


If you value what this story gives you, please consider supporting the Ely Standard. Click the link in the yellow box below for details.

Become a supporter

This newspaper has been a central part of community life for many years, through good times and bad, serving as your advocate and trusted source of local information. Our industry is facing testing times, which is why I’m asking for your support. Every single contribution will help us continue to produce award-winning local journalism that makes a measurable difference to our community.

Thank you.

Most Read

Most Read

Latest from the Ely Standard