Housing plans for Haddenham and Witchford are withdrawn just days before crunch decision is due

08:52 14 July 2014

ECDC

ECDC

Archant

Controversial plans for hundreds of new homes in Haddenham and Witchford were withdrawn at the 11th hour by planning officials in the interest of “fairness”.

East Cambridgeshire District Council’s planning committee had been due to rule on an application for 228 new homes submitted by Cheshire-based developer, Gladman, at its last meeting, on July

Planning officials at the council had recommended that both sets of plans were refused by councillors.

But, just days before the meeting, officers decided to withdraw the plans from the meeting following questions raised about its local plan – a document which sets outs the council vision for house building, population growth and new infrastructure over the next generation.

The query was raised by a planning inspector, who reviewed the document earlier in the year.

As the council was still in discussion with the inspector, planning officers decided that it would not be fair on Gladman to consider its plans without “all the information” being available to members of the committee.

A spokesman for the district council said: “We are currently in discussions with the planning inspector who is looking through our local plan regarding a question he has raised.

“To ensure fairness to developers and to allow members to have all the information they would need to make decisions we felt it was right to defer the applications to a future planning meeting.”

The inspector has been due to publish his report to the council last Friday.

No date has been set for this application to be determined by the planning committee.

Gladman wants to build 128 homes north of Field End, in Witchford, and a further 100 homes in nearby Haddenham. In both cases, villagers have raised repeated concerns about the extra traffic and size of the developments.

0 comments

Welcome , please leave your message below.

Optional - JPG files only
Optional - MP3 files only
Optional - 3GP, AVI, MOV, MPG or WMV files
Comments

Please log in to leave a comment and share your views with other Ely Standard visitors.

We enable people to post comments with the aim of encouraging open debate.

Only people who register and sign up to our terms and conditions can post comments. These terms and conditions explain our house rules and legal guidelines.

Comments are not edited by Ely Standard staff prior to publication but may be automatically filtered.

If you have a complaint about a comment please contact us by clicking on the Report This Comment button next to the comment.

Not a member yet?

Register to create your own unique Ely Standard account for free.

Signing up is free, quick and easy and offers you the chance to add comments, personalise the site with local information picked just for you, and more.

Sign up now

More news stories

A hair salon at Sutton has been forced to close temporarily after a car crashed through the front window.

Yesterday, 23:59

The Cambridgeshire Local Enterprise Partnership over the last four years has repeatedly said that Agri-tech is a key priority particularly in Fenland.

Yesterday, 16:54

Council leader James Palmer pulled off a remarkable first round victory today to win the Conservative nomination to contest the May election to become the first mayor of Cambridgeshire and Peterborough.

Yesterday, 23:43

The Greater Cambridge Greater Peterborough LEP (GCGP) has defended itself – and its spending in Fenland – in a statement issued to counter what they feel are unfair criticisms by MP Steve Barclay.

Most read stories

Most commented stories

Digital Edition

Image
Read the Ely Standard e-edition E-edition

Show Job Lists

Newsletter Sign Up