A third of councillors could go after key vote is agreed - but Boundary Commission will have final say

PUBLISHED: 16:01 19 April 2014 | UPDATED: 16:17 19 April 2014

Cllr James Palmer, leader of East Cambridgeshire District Council.

Cllr James Palmer, leader of East Cambridgeshire District Council.

Archant

A radical reform of East Cambridgeshire District Council – with the number of councillors cut by 12 to 27 – has been backed by members.

It is hoped that the move will save up to £50,000 a year in allowances and expenses – though it will not be introduced until May 2019.

A special meeting of the council was held last Tuesday where the outcome of recent reviews into councillor numbers was discussed.

As part of the changes, double-member wards could be chopped with the exception of Ely, Littleport and Soham.

But, despite the backing of the council’s 39 elected members, the proposal will still need the backing of the boundary commission, which will examine the council’s proposal before making a final ruling, expected in late 2015 or 2016.

Chief executive John Hill told the meeting that “one of the drivers for change is value for money, i.e. reducing the cost of democracy in the light of the budget challenges ahead”. The council is faced with finding savings of £3.5million by 2018.

At present 39 councillors cover an electorate of 65,520, representing an average ratio of 1,680 electors per member. But Mr Hill says there is considerable variance between wards.

In Soham North, for example, the member represents 2,145 people whilst in Littleport West the councillor represents 1,335.

Neighbouring Huntingdonshire has an average electorate per member of 2,514.

A previous attempt by the council to trigger a review was rejected by the commission in 2011. The council wanted a reduction of six councillors to 33, but the commission “did not agree” with the proposal and didn’t launch a review.

All councils can request a review under the Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Act 2009.

The commission is obliged to consider the request but is not compelled to agree to conduct a review if it feels the request doesn’t meet the best interests of voters.

1 comment

  • At last, some light in the end of the tunnel...

    Report this comment

    Sunnylife

    Saturday, April 19, 2014

The views expressed in the above comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this site

More news stories

Details have emerged of major IT failures within Cambridgeshire County Council that may have compromised schools Ofsted inspections and in one month alone could have cost the authority £560,000 in wasted man hours.

The Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Clinical Commissioning Group, is on our case. Well Tracy Dowling, chief officer, in the reply she gave to some of my questions seems to think so.

I beg to differ.

16:17

The number of homes to be built on the site of a garden centre in Fordham has been reduced by 40 per cent following a public consultation.

12:36

Young actors at King’s Ely Junior wowed audiences with their sell-out production of family favourite musical Cats.

Most read stories

Most commented stories

Digital Edition

Image
Read the Ely Standard e-edition E-edition
HOT JOBS

Show Job Lists

Newsletter Sign Up

Sign up to receive our regular email newsletter